Archive for the ‘The Journal of Nuclear Physics’ Category

Sourced from  the Journal of Nuclear Physics, Nuclear Experiments blog


The following post is from The Journal of Nuclear Physics blog:

June 17th, 2013 at 2:27 AM
Dear Andrea, the future of your invention is deeply connected with your person, if something bad should happens to you, is there anyone who could replace you?
I hope you all the best!
Many thanks

Andrea Rossi
June 17th, 2013 at 9:47 AM
Absolutely yes: our USA Partner has all the know how, with the industrial secrets. I am no more indispensable: just useful for the future evolution on which I am now working in the USA.
Warm Regards,

This means that inventor Andrea Rossi has already shared his secret catalyst with his secret US Partner.  If this is not mainstream news by the end of Summer 2013…  

The potential implication of this clean, comparatively cost-less technology as a solution to the catastrophic energy situation now facing the world is immensely important.

Numerologically speaking, Rossi must be the number 8. “The 8 balances the material and immaterial worlds. At its best, it is as spiritual as it is materialistic. The spiritual side of the 8 is practical, realistic and intelligent. It knows the difference between make-believe and genuine spiritual realizations. On the material plane, it is focused on results, often in the form of money, yet does not care much about money for the sake of money. It is not greedy, it sees money as a tool, not an end-result. It is generous and willing to take risks. People with strong 8s in their charts often make and lose fortunes a couple of times during their life. They never consider bankruptcy a reason to slow down or feel sorry, but, rather, come out stronger and more success-oriented than before.”


May 25, 2013

Today I was made aware of a threat to the inventor’s life when he posted the following on his blog,

The Journal of Nuclear Physics:

Journal of Nuclear Physics

Journal of Nuclear Physics

Nuclear experiments blog

Andrea Rossi
May 25th, 2013 at 10:33 AM
We are, obviously, under attack, as usually after a successful test, but this time the level of threat has been raised: not being able to attack under a scientific and/or technological point of view the Third Party Indipendent Test, some are clearly inviting to kill me ( if so, at last I will be able to rest, after working 16 hours per day!), others insulting, but there is one that is very disturbing: a blog, which our intelligence has discovered to be of the same snake that is gently inviting to kill ( sic) me, has written that there are actions pending upon me in Court: this is totally false. Our attorneys tried to sue the author of this false statement, but it turned out that the author is anonimous, just a false address of a nickname, strangely originated from the same source of the website that invites to kill me and suggests how to. In any case, I declare and swear that it is totally false that there are any actions in Court pending against me. Of course we will search the evidence to make a REAL action in Court against the snake that has put in the web this false information.
To know exactly what happened to me in past ( I mean 15- 20 years ago) please go to
Warm Regards,

Andrea Rossi

I felt compelled to correspond immediately thereafter.

May 25th, 2013 at 12:52 PM

Dear Andrea,

When skepticism becomes irrational, coercive and pathological it descends to the level of
requiring serious corrective action. As I have read some of the commentary regarding the 3rd
party report, I have to admit to a chuckle or two. One critique actually misinterpreted the
credentials of one of the Swedish scientists, and claimed he was a veterinarian! After
successful validation, we here in Brooklyn are very happy for your E-Cat success and its
progress in aiding the world. I hope that the goon(s) which have been unable to adequately
critique the test results, and have resorted to physical threats, find their way to the nearest
mental institution to receive the care they are desperately in need of!

Best wishes,


My reference of the veterinarian came from a May 24, 2013 article which was completely on point,

by Mark Gibbs in Forbes titled,

The E-Cat Testing Team, Real or Ringers? 


Here is my response from Dr. Rossi:

May 25th, 2013 at 1:14 PM
Dear Gerard:
Really there is an imbecile that said that one of the professors is a veterinarian ???
Ha,ha,ha! This is evidence of the fact that they cannot find anything serious, and this is the
best possible “peer reviewing”! Obviously all the examiners are Physic Professors or Physic
Researchers, all of them are Doctors in Physics. Same thing the reviewers listed in the
Thank you.
I agree with your point.
Warm Regards, Andrea Rossi

I find it uniquely refreshing how AR responds personally to everyone who writes to him at his blog, sometimes within minutes.