May 25, 2013
Today I was made aware of a threat to the inventor’s life when he posted the following on his blog,
The Journal of Nuclear Physics:
Nuclear experiments blog
May 25th, 2013 at 10:33 AM
TO THE READERS, IMPORTANT:
We are, obviously, under attack, as usually after a successful test, but this time the level of threat has been raised: not being able to attack under a scientific and/or technological point of view the Third Party Indipendent Test, some are clearly inviting to kill me ( if so, at last I will be able to rest, after working 16 hours per day!), others insulting, but there is one that is very disturbing: a blog, which our intelligence has discovered to be of the same snake that is gently inviting to kill ( sic) me, has written that there are actions pending upon me in Court: this is totally false. Our attorneys tried to sue the author of this false statement, but it turned out that the author is anonimous, just a false address of a nickname, strangely originated from the same source of the website that invites to kill me and suggests how to. In any case, I declare and swear that it is totally false that there are any actions in Court pending against me. Of course we will search the evidence to make a REAL action in Court against the snake that has put in the web this false information.
To know exactly what happened to me in past ( I mean 15- 20 years ago) please go to
I felt compelled to correspond immediately thereafter.
May 25th, 2013 at 12:52 PM
When skepticism becomes irrational, coercive and pathological it descends to the level of
requiring serious corrective action. As I have read some of the commentary regarding the 3rd
party report, I have to admit to a chuckle or two. One critique actually misinterpreted the
credentials of one of the Swedish scientists, and claimed he was a veterinarian! After
successful validation, we here in Brooklyn are very happy for your E-Cat success and its
progress in aiding the world. I hope that the goon(s) which have been unable to adequately
critique the test results, and have resorted to physical threats, find their way to the nearest
mental institution to receive the care they are desperately in need of!
My reference of the veterinarian came from a May 24, 2013 article which was completely on point,
by Mark Gibbs in Forbes titled,
Here is my response from Dr. Rossi:
May 25th, 2013 at 1:14 PM
Really there is an imbecile that said that one of the professors is a veterinarian ???
Ha,ha,ha! This is evidence of the fact that they cannot find anything serious, and this is the
best possible “peer reviewing”! Obviously all the examiners are Physic Professors or Physic
Researchers, all of them are Doctors in Physics. Same thing the reviewers listed in the
I agree with your point.
Warm Regards, Andrea Rossi
I find it uniquely refreshing how AR responds personally to everyone who writes to him at his blog, sometimes within minutes.